Best in the World v. Best for the World Leaders

The Graziadio Difference

Best in the World vs. Best for the World Leader

At Pepperdine Graziadio, we believe there is a significant difference between being a leader that is best for the world versus a leader that is best in the world. While this may seem like a trivial footnote, there’s a vast difference in meaning, giving us the opportunity to define genuine servant leadership. 

Defining a Best in the World Leader

The word "in" exhibits limitation and a single direction. Having the qualities of a Best in the World Leader portrays a similar idea—there is only room at the top for one. This mentality forgoes the consideration of others and focuses solely on self-achievement. In some instances, achieving this status entails overlooking the ramifications of negative actions to earn money, power, and fame. This method of guidance is a fleeting state of mind and does not ethically transpire in values-based leadership. 

Defining a Best for the World Leader

Following the vision of being a Best for the World Leader implies movement towards a higher purpose. It necessitates leading by example and committing to ethical business practices regardless of circumstance. It’s about considering the implications of every decision, making concerted efforts to benefit more than just the business’s bottom line. Best for the World Leaders portray boundless servant leadership, doing the right thing every time even when the road ahead seems unfathomable. Being a Best for the World Leaders is more than just a saying—it is a calling.