18 Nov | 2009
Corporate Social Responsibility is redundant
GUEST POST
By Rich Danker, MPP/MBA 2010
Rich is a student in Pepperdine’s three-year Master of Business Administration/Master of Public Policy program, graduating in April. His aim is to work in finance or economics.

Over and over again at the Graziadio School of Business and Management I hear the refrain from students that they are interested in sustainability or corporate social responsibility as a career. These phrases have left many MBA candidates captivated, here and on other campuses across the country. Indeed, it seems to be the hot topic in business for this era; much like strategic management was for the 1990s. The fact that so many students are aiming to work in a field that sounds well, dubious, is a cause for concern. How did we get here?
Corporate social responsibility – or CSR, as they call it – is supposed to be a way for companies to measure and monitor their impact on the wider world. Every layer of society – the ethical, legal, environmental, and political realms – is relevant in assessing how a firm operates. The ultimate goal is to create a certification system that quantifies performance in these areas. Hand-in-hand with this is the stakeholder theory, a concept which proposes that the purpose of a business is to serve the variety of interests which have stakes in the company: shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers, as well as communities and governments. The stakeholder model upends the two established notions of business purpose – creating profit for the owners and, as Peter Drucker formulated, creating and keeping a customer.
Corporate social responsibility and the stakeholder theory are radical departures from the traditional ways of understanding business. These ideas don’t go so far as to venture to replace them, but in some cases they can be weighted equally. Indeed, Triple Bottom Line analysis claims to account for the firm’s contribution toward people, planet, and profits. Students frequently list it is a qualification on their resumes.
Have these business students suddenly gotten altruistic or uninterested in creating wealth? Has an army of do-gooders swarmed our schools? Maybe. But more than anything else, the whole thing appears to be a product of our times. The current crop of degree-takers came of age during the Enron scandal, a cauldron of fraud, deception, and expertise that confirmed the worst impressions about American big business. The other crackups following it – including a chief executive’s $6,000 shower curtain and Martha Stewart’s lying to the feds – brought to the forefront a layer of seaminess and self-regard. It prompted business schools to roll out courses in ethics with these case studies in mind. Corporate social responsibility expanded upon this by looking beyond the individual to the company, and asking us to consider its behavior. Read more »



By 
